The submission for 'Protege' (withprotege.ai) presents a relevant concept—secure AI training data sharing—but lacks any verifiable evidence of existence or execution. The URL is not indexed in public search results, and the submission contains critical red flags, specifically the contradictory and hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' alongside a team size of '0'. Due to the absence of a live product, technical details, or valid traction, the project receives a minimal score reflecting only the theoretical relevance of the problem statement.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline