The submission appears to be for a design consultancy or portfolio ('robbruce.design') rather than a scalable technology product. While the project name 'Prizm' and claims of mass adoption ('most people have used my product') likely reference past work for major brands (e.g., Oakley), the specific project submitted shows minimal direct traction as a standalone entity. The financial metrics ($500k 'marketcap' over 7 years with a team of 6) suggest a small-scale service business or early-stage venture rather than a high-growth platform. The extreme brevity and lack of verifiable evidence in the submission heavily impact the score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline