The submission represents a legitimate regional medical facility (Pretoria Eye Institute), but the entry quality is extremely poor and contains significant data inaccuracies. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' are hyperbolic and false. The inclusion of 'Performing Arts' as a technology tag and the vague financial metric ('all time marketcap') further degrade credibility. While the underlying entity has real-world utility in healthcare, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of traction or innovation suitable for a high Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline