The submission describes a generic software development company but lacks specific product details. Crucially, the claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') and audience ('everyone') are demonstrably false or highly exaggerated for a service provider of this profile. The revenue figure is mislabeled as 'marketcap' without currency, and the team size cannot be verified against the digital footprint. The project scores poorly due to lack of verifiable utility, unsubstantiated claims, and low-quality submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline