The project represents a legitimate and highly sophisticated technology (Answer Set Programming) backed by the University of Potsdam. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring a pseudonym ('ThunderFang'), unverifiable and factually incorrect claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product'), and nonsensical revenue metrics ('marketcap: 2500000'). While the underlying utility of Potassco solutions is high for niche industrial optimization, the submission fails to demonstrate professional commercial viability or realistic market awareness, resulting in a heavily penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline