The project addresses a valid problem (digital addressing in regions with poor infrastructure) but the submission lacks credibility. The claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the lack of verifiable traction data and the local nature of the domain (.cm). The response quality is poor, with missing metrics and exaggerated audience claims, resulting in a low score consistent with an early-stage or unverified project.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline