The submission appears to be a hallucinated or deceptive entry. It conflates 'pooldata.io' (a defunct Web3 data union startup with <10 employees) with 'Pool Corporation' (a publicly traded Fortune 500 company with ~$11B market cap). The revenue, team size, and business description are lifted from Pool Corp, while the URL and project name belong to a completely different, inactive entity. The traction claim 'most people have used my product' is verifiable false for the provided URL. Due to these critical red flags and misrepresentation, a penalty score is assigned.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline