The project presents a valid concept (qualitative research marketplace) but the submission lacks credibility due to hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a complete absence of digital footprint or search results for the specific domain and brand. The response quality is low, containing malformed data and zero evidence of the claimed traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline