The project submission for Plank Homeopathy suffers from critical credibility issues, primarily the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' despite no verifiable digital footprint. The misuse of the term 'marketcap' for revenue and the lack of specific technical details further degrade the score. While the concept of online homeopathy consultation has some inherent utility, the execution described appears rudimentary, and the claims of a 30-person team are unsupported by external evidence. The submission scores highly on red flags regarding traction and data accuracy.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline