The project URL points to Planetary, a legitimate and established digital product studio. However, the submission data is of extremely low quality, containing hallucinations (categorized as 'Biomanufacturing'), falsified traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and nonsensical revenue data. The score acknowledges the real-world utility of the agency identified by the URL but is heavily penalized due to the lack of verifiable evidence and the unreliable nature of the submission text.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline