The project appears to be a small local design consultancy rather than a scalable technology product. The submission contains significant inaccuracies, including demonstrably false claims of global reach ('most people have used my product') and an unverifiable or erroneous market cap figure. While the business likely provides valid services to local clients, the lack of technical innovation, minimal verifiable traction, and poor data quality result in a very low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline