The project 'Pipe17' represents a legitimate B2B Order Management Solution with verifiable external traction (Series A funding, ~50 employees). However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, containing demonstrable falsehoods (claiming audience is 'everyone' and 'most people have used my product'). Due to the 'Proof of Usefulness' methodology emphasizing the submission's evidence and accuracy, the score is heavily penalized by low Quality Factors (0.5). The entity is real and useful, but the application fails to prove it.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline