The project represents a legitimate local immigration consultancy in New Zealand (Pinnacle Immigration Advisers) rather than a technology product. The submission contains significant red flags, including hyperbolic claims ('everyone' as audience, 'most people have used my product') and misuse of financial terminology ('marketcap' for a consultancy). While the underlying service business is real and functional, the lack of technological innovation, exaggerated metrics, and poor submission quality result in a very low Proof of Usefulness score for a technology evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline