The submission for 'Piloc' contains significant red flags indicating a low-quality or test entry. The claimed team size (2,965) and traction ('most people have used my product') are unverifiable and realistically impossible for a project with no visible digital footprint. The description contains typos, and the technology list refers to soft skills ('leadership') rather than technical stacks. The 'Audience Reach' claim of 'everyone' demonstrates a lack of market focus. The project lacks verifiable utility, innovation, or market presence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline