The project appears to be a traditional construction or holding company ('Pile Holding') rather than a technology venture. The submission contains hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., audience is 'everyone', usage by 'most people'), lacks technical detail, and presents confused financial metrics. Without verifiable evidence of the claimed 'marketcap' or digital utility, the project scores poorly on Proof of Usefulness standards.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline