The project refers to 'Pharma Analytics', a verifiable but small UK-based consultancy established in 2005. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience 'everyone'). The project name 'DeepBlade' does not appear on the provided website or public indices, suggesting it may be an internal tool or a misnomer. While the underlying business has a legitimate history in a high-value niche, the lack of concrete evidence, inflated team size (claimed 30 vs. actual ~2), and poor response quality significantly penalize the score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline