The submission represents Pfizer, a global pharmaceutical leader with undeniable real-world utility and massive scale. However, the submission quality is extremely low, relying on vague claims ('most people have used my product') and containing minor factual errors (Launch date 1848 vs actual 1849). While the entity's intrinsic value drives high scores in utility and reach, the lack of detailed evidence in the application significantly suppresses the Quality Factors (Qi). The score reflects a 'Much larger scale' entity penalized for a poor submission effort.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline