The submission appears to be a mix of contradictory data points: the description outlines an Oslo-based B2B startup (Perlo.io), while the stats (Team 240, Launch 1950) likely refer to a US-based construction firm (Perlo Construction), and the traction claims ('most people have used my product') are factually impossible for a specialized B2B tool. The lack of coherent evidence results in a very low score despite the potential utility of the described solution.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline