The submission contains extremely vague descriptions ('academic works and perspectives') and disqualifyingly exaggerated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') without any supporting evidence. There is no verifiable technology, revenue, or user base data provided. The project appears to be a personal portfolio or placeholder with no demonstrable real-world utility or market traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline