The submission for 'Percs' references a valid Web3 SaaS domain (getpercs.com) but fails to provide credible evidence of its utility or traction. The input contains significant contradictions (e.g., describing the project as Web3 SaaS while selecting 'Permit, Enforcement, and Revenue Collection Systems' as the business type) and hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product') that undermine credibility. While the actual company likely possesses some traction in the Shopify ecosystem, the submission itself offers no verifiable metrics, revenue data, or technical details, resulting in a score reflecting 'no verifiable traction' and low submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline