The submission for Pattanayak Engineering Inc. suffers from severe credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a small, unverified 6-person consultancy with no significant search footprint. While the listed technologies (NET, Java, React) are standard, the lack of verifiable evidence, the misuse of financial terminology ('marketcap' likely confused with revenue or valuation), and the hyperbolic audience reach claims result in a negligible score. The project appears to be a generic IT service provider with poor presentation and no proven traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline