The submission for 'Path Net Zero' suffers from critical quality issues and a lack of verifiable evidence. While the sector (Travel Emissions/ClimateTech) is relevant, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and statistically impossible for the context, severely damaging credibility. Critical data points like revenue and active users are missing or nonsensical ('all time marketcap: null'). Although a team size of 64 is claimed, the lack of supporting detail and the poor quality of the response suggests either a low-effort submission or a potential disconnect from the actual business entity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline