The submission for 'Partner Technology' (IronWing) suffers from critically low credibility and quality. While the description outlines a potentially legitimate SAP consulting business with ESG focus, the supporting data is contradictory and unreliable. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a specialized B2B consultancy. The revenue metric refers to 'marketcap' (a term generally reserved for public companies or crypto assets) and cites $17M for a 6-person team, which appears disjointed or erroneous. The submission contains multiple spelling errors ('trustworth', 'wel trainned') and lacks specific evidence of reach or innovation. Consequently, the project scores in the lowest tier, reflecting a lack of verifiable traction and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline