The submission represents a legitimate and prestigious entity (Juniors ParisTech/ParisTech), but the data provided contains significant hallucinations and low-quality responses. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and 'audience: everyone' are demonstrably false. The 'marketcap' figure appears erroneous for a student federation. While the underlying institution has high real-world value, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence or coherent details, resulting in a heavily penalized score due to lack of credibility in the application itself.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline