The project is a defunct literary magazine (active 2011-2017) based in Lawrence, Kansas. The submission claims grossly exaggerated metrics (e.g., 'marketcap: 17000000', 'most people have used my product', 'team size 125') which contradict the niche, local, and archival nature of the actual project. The 'market cap' figure appears to be hallucinated or confused with a crypto token of the same name. With no current utility, false traction claims, and a discontinuation date of 2017, the Proof of Usefulness is negligible.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline