The submission represents a legitimate established institution (University of Pannonia, est. 1949) and describes a valid pedagogical project. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring exaggerated traction claims ('most people have used my product'), nonsensical financial data ('marketcap'), and a lack of specific technical or impact evidence. The score reflects the existence of the institution but heavily penalizes the lack of verifiable proof provided in the entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline