The project represents a legitimate, established business (Osmo UK) with strong real-world utility and verifiable off-platform traction (125 employees, operating since 1987). However, the submission quality is exceptionally poor, featuring hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people'), vague data, and unprofessional formatting. While the underlying business scale justifies a higher score than a startup, the low-effort submission and lack of software-focused technical innovation limit the Proof of Usefulness score compared to high-quality technology projects.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline