The submission for Ordinary Holdings presents significant discrepancies between its grandiose claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'everyone' audience) and the lack of verifiable digital footprint or specific evidence. The stated market cap of 2.5M is inconsistent with a company claiming universal reach and a team of 30 staff in Toronto. The submission lacks technical detail and verifiable traction metrics, resulting in a low score reflecting high uncertainty and poor evidence quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline