The submission represents a standard SEO agency ('ORANKS INFOTECH') but suffers from critical credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and undermines the project's evidence of traction and audience reach. While the agency appears to exist with some client history, the submission is low-quality, lacks verifiable revenue or usage data, and relies on hyperbolic marketing language rather than factual metrics. The project offers standard service utility with no technological innovation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline