The project represents a generic IT outsourcing and web development service with a highly questionable submission. Key claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') are factually impossible for a 6-person team, severely damaging credibility. The revenue metric is confusingly labeled ('marketcap'), and the technical description lacks any specific innovation or competitive advantage. While the core service (web dev) has inherent utility, the lack of verifiable data and the low quality of the response result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline