The submission references a legitimate, high-value enterprise software company (OpenText/Metastorm) but fails to provide verifiable or accurate evidence. Claims such as 'everyone' for audience and 'most people have used my product' are objectively false for B2B architecture software. The submission quality is extremely low (username 'BlazeFang', erratic revenue formatting), suggesting either a lack of seriousness or impersonation. The score reflects the existence of the underlying technology but is heavily penalized for the lack of credible proof in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline