The project represents a legitimate vocational college (OCHT) in Ontario, but the submission is of extremely low quality. Key data points such as audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and factually incorrect. The 'marketcap' figure likely confuses lifetime revenue or valuation with public market terminology. While the underlying entity exists and has real-world utility as an educational institution, the lack of technical innovation and the unprofessional nature of the submission (e.g., 'ShadowWalker', lack of verifiable metrics) result in a significantly penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline