While 'OnFarm' appears to refer to a legitimate, acquired AgTech company (OnFarm Systems), this submission provides extremely low-quality evidence. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is verifiable false and damages credibility. The audience reach of 'everyone' is unrealistic for a niche B2B agricultural product. The submission fails to substantiate the project's historical utility or traction with any concrete data, resulting in a score that reflects the poor quality of the 'proof' provided rather than the historical validity of the company.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline