The submission represents a Site Management Organization (service business) with no apparent software technology component. Critical credibility issues exist, including the hyperbolic and factually incorrect traction claim that 'most people have used my product'. The response lacks verifiable metrics, technical details, or realistic audience definitions. The project appears to be a legitimate local service business in Varanasi, but the submission quality is too poor and devoid of evidence to warrant a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline