The project submission lacks verifiable data and contains hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The URL does not appear to have a significant public presence or indexed content. The description suggests a generic IT consultancy service rather than a distinct product, and the financial metrics are confused ('marketcap' vs revenue). The low score reflects the lack of evidence, poor response quality, and absence of verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline