The submission represents 'Olympus DAO', a well-known DeFi protocol, but the quality of the entry is extremely poor. Key fields like revenue and team size are null, and the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect and hyperbolic. While the actual Olympus DAO protocol has significant historical innovation and capital traction (DeFi 2.0, bonding), the evaluation applies a strict Quality Factor (Qi) penalty of 0.5 across all categories due to the lack of verifiable data in the submission and the potential for impersonation. The score reflects the high intrinsic value of the underlying protocol heavily discounted by the low-effort, unverifiable submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline