The submission lists the project as 'GoldenForge' but the URL and description describe 'OLIANT', a legitimate B2B IT services and staff augmentation firm. External verification confirms Oliant has 50+ employees and international offices (Chicago, Sofia, Buenos Aires), indicating solid traction despite the submission claiming 'marketcap: null'. The score is heavily penalized due to the extremely low quality of the submission, which includes false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and a likely erroneous project name. The business itself is viable and established, but the submission fails to accurately represent it.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline