The submission for 'Ohmlabs' presents significant verification challenges due to vague claims and a lack of verifiable evidence. The project name conflicts with a well-known US metrology firm (Ohm-Labs, Inc.), creating identity confusion, while the domain (ohmlabs.eu) appears to belong to a smaller, distinct consultancy. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and unsupported by a portfolio. The stated financial metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and, if interpreted as lifetime revenue over 8 years for a 6-person team, suggests very low economic traction. The response quality is critically low, failing to demonstrate the 'Proof of Usefulness' required for a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline