The submission for Officengine suffers significantly from poor data quality and unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience 'everyone'). While external context suggests it is a legitimate boutique back-office/accounting firm for startups founded in 2014, the submission fails to provide verifiable metrics or technical details. The PoU score is heavily penalized for the lack of credible evidence and the presence of hyperbolic statements.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline