The project 'Ocoos' appears to be a legitimate, established B2B platform (founded 2011, ~30 employees) offering integrated web/CRM solutions. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing a likely invalid or internal URL (ocoosaws.com), vague technical descriptions ('Computer Software'), and demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the underlying business metrics (team size, longevity) suggest stability, the low-quality input and lack of verifiable evidence in the submission severely penalize the score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline