The project submission for 'Nuclii' lacks verifiable evidence of existence or traction. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is unsubstantiated and highly improbable given the lack of a significant search footprint. The description (microservices/APIs) contradicts the business type category (Vulnerability Scanning), and the similarity in name to the popular open-source tool 'Nuclei' suggests potential confusion or brand imitation without the associated merit. The submission quality is extremely low, with empty fields and generic tags.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline