The submission for 'Nuant' presents a significant discrepancy between the submitted data and the actual project reality. While external verification confirms Nuant as a legitimate Swiss B2B platform for institutional digital asset portfolio management, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing false claims (e.g., 'everyone' as audience, 'most people' as traction), nonsensical data (e.g., 'leadership' as technology), and likely bot-generated contact details. The score reflects the existence of the underlying business but is heavily penalized for the lack of credible evidence and the poor quality of the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline