The project is Notion, a globally recognized productivity decacorn with undeniable utility and market dominance ($10B+ valuation, 30M+ users). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring vague claims ('most people', 'everyone') and lacking specific evidence. While the verifiable reality of the product drives high base scores for utility and market fit, the poor response quality significantly penalizes the Quality Factors (Qi) for Reach and Traction, preventing a top-tier score (800+). The final score reflects a massive industry leader weighed down by a weak submission entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline