The submission for 'NotCommon' (or ThunderShade) presents significant red flags, primarily the unverifiable and hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product'. While 'NotCommon' corresponds to a niche Web3 identity infrastructure project, the submission lacks credible data, provides nonsensical technology tags (e.g., 'construction'), and fails to demonstrate real-world utility or traction matching its claims. The low effort and inaccurate responses result in a score reflecting minimal to no verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline