The submission for 'Nock Nock Creative Studio' (incorrectly named 'DeepClaw' in the title field) describes an agile creative agency with significant claims of 30 employees and major clients like ARD and Sonnen. However, the project lacks a verifiable digital footprint (no search results for 'nocknock.studio' or the specific agency name in Berlin/Hamburg). The submission suffers from severe quality issues, including a mismatched project name, hyperbolic traction claims ('most people have used my product'), and confused financial metrics ('marketcap' in revenue field). While the service description is detailed, the lack of evidence and submission errors result in a low score typical of unverifiable or low-quality entries.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline