The project appears to be a dormant or pivoting lifestyle business (dinner experiences) rather than a scalable technology venture. While the description references past media coverage (Vogue, Business Insider), the submission relies on hyperbolic and verifiably false claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product'). There is no evidence of technical innovation or current active users, and the business model (offline events) has low scalability compared to software benchmarks. The extremely low score reflects the lack of verifiable data, poor response quality, and minimal technical implementation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline