The project addresses a valid use case (digital ownership of books) but the submission is severely undermined by hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'eliminate 100% of piracy'). While the token (NFTBS) technically exists, the lack of verifiable revenue, the unlikely team size claim (30-50), and the unprofessional response quality result in a low score indicative of a project with minimal credible traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline