The project appears to be a legacy IT consulting firm (founded 2005) with negligible verifiable digital footprint. The submission contains multiple red flags, including demonstrably false claims of reach ('everyone', 'most people have used my product'), misuse of financial terminology ('all time marketcap'), and generic descriptions. While the business may exist locally, the lack of verifiable online presence and the low quality of the submission data result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline