The submission represents a digital agency or portfolio with extremely vague and exaggerated claims (e.g., audience 'everyone', traction 'most people have used my product'). While the reference to 'Golf Wang' suggests potential legitimate past work, the lack of verifiable details, the misuse of financial terms ('marketcap' for revenue), and the minimal technical description ('Internet') heavily penalize the score. The project falls into the 'Minimal traction' category due to these red flags and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline