NeuroCONCISE appears to be a legitimate university spin-out (Ulster University) developing commendable BCI technology for severe disabilities. However, the submission itself is extremely low quality and contains demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' and audience reach of 'everyone'). While the underlying technology is innovative and socially useful, the lack of verifiable metrics, the highly unprofessional response data, and the niche nature of the actual product result in a score reflecting minimal verifiable traction in the context of this evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline